Thanks for bringing this up Dominique. Костя, what do we need to move
forward into this next release?
I also, with you, would like to have one common format shared with
JSword to store our mappings. Do you have any comments about their
format? Is it something we should simply adopt and write a generator
utility to our .h mappings? Does JSword's format include anything we
don't support? or vice versa?
Troy
On 10/02/2016 09:08 AM, Dominique Corbex wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 01:45:00 +0300
Костя Маслюк <kostyamasl...@gmail.com> wrote:
It is still important to place all we have for av11n schemes and mappings
in one place.
I agree..
At http://crosswire.org/~kalemas/work/v11nmapping there are examples
I'd like to submit sword mappings to these French versification schemes
before the next release of Sword.
So, I just need to write 3 Bible xml files with all the <OsisIDs>
related to these schemes and the mappings <refMap> at the end, and run:
$ python refMap2cpp.py Bible.<versification>.xml
and then add the resulting code to the associated .h file.
Am I right?
In Christ
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
