On 2017-11-29, 14:23 GMT, Greg Hellings wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Cyrille wrote: >> That's for sure, but not enough (from my point of view). >> What's you experience of gitlab?
(I am the leader of the M2Crypto revival project hosted on https://gitlab.com/m2crypto/m2crypto/ ) My experience is very good. There are some moments of instability, but they are rather rare and I don't remember when was the last time I couldn't do something because of problems with the server. It is true that GitHub has still more features than GitLab, but I really don't see anything which I would be missing. It seems to me that GitHub is firmly moving into the area of creeping featuretitis when it adds features which are available elsewhere, just to get better lock-in (in-GitHub Slack, really?). Three features which for-free GitLab has and GitHub will probably never have: * private projects; it could be particularly interesting for some of our Biblical modules, which need to be developed in private before shared; * export between different GitLab hosts; not sure how well it works with GitLab.com, one would probably have to ask support for help, but the fact is that whatever data you enter into GitHub (aside from the code itself) is more or less forever locked there. I have participated in couple of efforts to move a project out of the GitHub and it was never good experience, and there was always a significant data loss. * CI on dedicated machines; not sure if anybody cares here. Best, Matěj -- http://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mcepl<at>ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 Anger is often what pain looks like when it shows itself in public. -- Krista Tippett _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page