On 2018-11-23, 09:32 GMT, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > 1) If there is substantial need for a new v11n for - a single > historical hugely important text > - a group of texts following e.g. a particular translation > tradition (Like SYnodalProt for IBT texts, NRSV for UBS and > Wycliffe.
That would apply. I hope this av11n could apply to all Protestant Bibles keeping Apocrypha as separate books (not like Catholic Bibles, which incorporate deuterocanonical texts in particular books, if possible). I.e., the differentation factor is “Are there separate books called ‘Additions to Esther’ etc.”? > "need" is vaguely defined as more than ~ 100 verses out of > place or substantial other problems. 100 verses amount to 0.3% > are and unlikely to cause significant upset to any user. In > general I find that there are either only a few or many > hundreds out of line. See the log on https://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp/make-CzeB21-osis2mod-log.txt Is it enough wrong? > Also, in order to help to find those reasons - can you link to > the OSIS file rather than your modue? Not sure, what you mean. https://gitlab.com/mcepl/CzeB21 is pure OSIS XML, isn't it? Blessings, Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mc...@ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 Economics is the only discipline where two people can win a Nobel Prize for saying exactly the opposite thing! -- Eamonn Butler of Adam Smith Institute on Nobel Prize awards for year 2001 _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
