On 10.03.19 17:26, David Haslam wrote:
We already provide a module encryption feature. Copyright owners themselves are expected to manage the user access to unlock keys. Only a few publishers have so far chosen to avail themselves of this facility. One that has is the publisher of the NET Bible.
The question is whether that is going to happen with the given constraints. If copyright owners have to do that work, then they may not want that. But if that digital infrastructure would be managed by the organization that distributes the actual bible software modules (CrossWire), it may turn out as an enabler!
Have you guys thought about a different approach concerning copyrighted modules, but didn't pursue it, because it would require too much maintenance effort? I would like to understand the motivation a bit more, thanks for helping me understand.
I think CrossWire, Sword and all the frontends would gain a much bigger user base if modern translations would be available as Sword modules :).
Best regards, Tobias _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
