On 4/23/24 10:47, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
It is dependent on whether or not a module has the StrongsPadding=true in its .conf file. All Strongs-keyed dictionaries should have this entry.
Well, now, that's an educational moment. Never heard of StrongsPadding before. Apparently neither has much of anyone else.
$ pwd /home/karl/.sword/mods.d $ ls | wc -l 890 $ grep StrongsPadding= * bosworthtoller.conf:StrongsPadding=false eusebian.conf:StrongsPadding=false mywsc.conf:StrongsPadding=false zhenglish.conf:StrongsPadding=false https://wiki.crosswire.org/DevTools:conf_Files#StrongsPadding StrongsPadding At the heart of our lexicon/dictionary drivers, we have some old logic which tries to detect if a key value is a Strong's number, and if so, then pad it with leading zeros accordingly. To support this logic, the recognition has recently been added for an optional new .conf entry for lexicon/dictionary modules: StrongsPadding=true|falseHow "recent" is this addition? Should other modules (Bibles, commentaries) have it, so as to indicate how its Strongs markup should be handled?
On its face, this is ambiguous: Is StrongsPadding=true an indication that the module /has/ padding already, or that it /needs/ padding to be provided?
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
