The public reaction is analogous, yet the severity pales in comparison. This is something that goes back several decades and implicates several *active* participants - one of which we all know and respect from those days was allegedly implicated and I can't even bear to believe it, let alone mention his name in this context.
Sent from my iPhone On Nov 12, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Richard Cuff <[email protected]> wrote: > The degree to which this appears to have shaken the BBC is analogous to the > collective shudder we had here in PA over the Penn State University / Jerry > Sandusky matter. > > If this had been 1-2 years ago it wouldn't have mattered as much at the World > Service given its separation from the rest of the BBC, but with the melding > of the WS into the rest of the Beeb it becomes more problematic. > > RC > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Rob de Santos <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks for posting the link, Rich. Many reactions come to mind. The width >> and breadth of these scandals is amazing. The breakdown in the checks and >> internal controls is disturbing. I wonder how many similar instances in >> major media organizations go undetected: any, a few, many? > > _______________________________________________ > Swprograms mailing list > [email protected] > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms > > To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to > [email protected]?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL > shown above. >
_______________________________________________ Swprograms mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to [email protected]?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.
