+1 2012/7/20 Ketan Padegaonkar <ketanpadegaon...@gmail.com>
> +1. Although I'm not involved with swtbot anymore. > > -Ketan > On Jul 20, 2012 3:20 PM, "Mickael Istria" <mist...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> So it is now clear that there are some issues with Eclipse 4.2: >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=385527 >> Some patches were already contributed ( >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=381683#c2 ) but it seems >> like some of them break compatibility with 3.x stream. I am a bit >> pessimistic with the ability to support both 3.x and 4.2 at the same time >> (I'd be glad if someone could convince me of the contrary). >> What about dropping support for 3.x starting from the next version >> (currently 2.0.6, but we should probably change that to 2.1.0 to highlight >> the breakage). So people using 3.x platform could still use 2.0.5, whereas >> people using Eclipse 4.2 would use 2.1.0. >> We can also think, if necessary, of publishing a 2.0.6 versions compliant >> with 3.x in case of critical fix or major improvement that make us feel >> this deserves a build for 3.x too. >> >> What do you think? >> -- >> Mickael Istria >> Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools> >> My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My >> Tweets<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swtbot-dev mailing list >> swtbot-dev@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swtbot-dev >> >> > _______________________________________________ > swtbot-dev mailing list > swtbot-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swtbot-dev > > -- Matthias
_______________________________________________ swtbot-dev mailing list swtbot-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swtbot-dev
