I agree, two entries are not needed. Rastislav Wagner JBDS QA irc: rawagner
Red Hat Czech Purkynova 99, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mickael Istria" <mist...@redhat.com> To: "SWTBot developers list" <swtbot-dev@eclipse.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 2:07:59 PM Subject: [swtbot-dev] Do we really need a JDT Generator feature? Hi all, I'm tempted to remove the org.eclipse.swtbot.generator.jdt.feature and include directly the org.eclipse.swtbot.generator.jdt bundle into the org.eclipse.swtbot.generator.feature. Indeed, features are only meant to provide nice UI, and it seems to me that having 2 entries for the Generator doesn't help much. And people who want to use generator without using JDT can simply not put the org.eclipse.swtbot.generator.jdt bundle in their target-platform or lauch configuration. Also, I'd like to make the org,eclipse.swtbot.eclipse feature (which is about IDE integration) reference the org.eclipse.swtbot.generator.feature feature. What do you think about this proposal? -- Mickael Istria Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat My blog - My Tweets _______________________________________________ swtbot-dev mailing list swtbot-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swtbot-dev _______________________________________________ swtbot-dev mailing list swtbot-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swtbot-dev
