Phil Quitslund wrote: > As I said, I do think we can track a "virtually" active shell but I'd like to > drive the spike with some tests. What's the best way for me to get > contributions to you? Do you have a sandbox I can commit into?
There's no sandbox. I suspect you may not really need any of the swtbot source code for doing the spikes we're discussing here. If you sign up at bitbucket.org you can pull in the svn repository from https://www.bitbucket.org/ketan/swtbot/ and then follow step 2 onwards on http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/SubversionToMercurialHowto you'll be able to keep up with the 2.0 branch. > We've all got this problem. *sigh* You're probably right that this will be > considered a bit low on the SWT priority list. Still, might not hurt to ask. > Perhaps once the migration to eclipse.org is complete. Will you be at > EclipseCon? I bet if we ply those guys with beer we could engage in a little > brainstorming. I'm myself awaiting for this, my travel to eclipsecon would depend on whether my talk is accepted. > All good points. I'd be happy if we could get some traction in win32 and > macosx. I'm guessing that if we succeed in that we can recruit some linux > folks > to pitch in. Let's see how your spikes would progress and we could target the native stuff for a 2.1/2.2 timeframe. For now I'm just putting my head and getting 2.0 out the door. -- Ketan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ SWTBot-users mailing list SWTBot-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/swtbot-users http://swtbot.org/ - a functional testing tool for SWT/Eclipse
