I know this is annoying for you guys.  Checking it in is the hard
part, actually, as there's a bunch of non-versioned files, likely
crazy SVN breakage and manual merging (even for the branch itself),
and so forth.  It'll take me a good day to do the commit, but I'll try
to get to it soon, especially now that there's interest in hacking
--philip

On 5/18/07, Rottenchester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a couple of bugs we're working in sapling that are claimed
> to be fixed in the wikis branch.  But, as I mentioned this morning,
> none of the wikis code has been checked in.   It seems like a waste
> for us to go out and re-fix those bugs, and it is also a lost
> opportunity to start to merge wikis and trunk.
>
> I don't want to be pesty - just because I'm ready to do something
> doesn't mean that Philip should be.  That said, it's been over a month
> since wikis went live, so I want to start a discussion that I hope
> will let us nail this issue down.  Here are a couple points:
>
> 1. Any check-in is better than none.   I don't think that wikis
> changes need to be merged into trunk for a "good" check-in.    I think
> a check-in of wikis, warts and all, will be better than the situation
> we're in.
>
> 2.  A check-in will eliminate some of the mystery about the delta
> between sapling and wikis.  Though the goals of the two projects seem
> to be different, my guess is that the common code between the two is
> pretty large.
>
> 3.  Getting wikis into trac and keeping it maintained there will
> benefit wikis even if the merge is a long way off.  When someone fixes
> a sapling bug, they can at least see if that bug is in the wikis code.
>
> Anyway, I'm offering this up to try to start a constructive
> conversation, and hope it's taken in that spirit.
> _______________________________________________
> Sycamore-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.projectsycamore.org/
> https://tools.cernio.com/mailman/listinfo/sycamore-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Sycamore-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.projectsycamore.org/
https://tools.cernio.com/mailman/listinfo/sycamore-dev

Reply via email to