Public Symposium

The School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry, Faculty of Arts at the
University of Sydney presents

How Free should Free Speech be? Philosophical Perspectives

Convenor: Duncan Ivison

--UPDATED PAPER TITLES AND ABSTRACTS--

Simone Chambers (University of Toronto)
Civility and Public Reason

This paper investigates informal norms of civility that accompany our
conceptions of reasoned discourse. When does civility have a chilling effect
on speech? Does the sincere wish not to offend, for example, take race off
the table as a topic of public conversation?  Is there a civil way to
express outrage even disgust with the actions of others? Does the presence
of injustice relax our expectations of civility?  These are some of the
questions that will be raised in the course of the paper.

Philip Pettit (Princeton)
ŒFreedoms of Speech¹

How robust should freedom of speech be? Do you enjoy freedom of speech if
you are not frustrated in saying what you happen to want to say? Or must it
also be the case that you would not have been frustrated had you said
anything else instead, or indeed said nothing? Or, to go to a yet higher
pitch, must it also be the case that all this remains true under variations
in how benignly others regard you. Must it be the case that it holds
robustly and not just by grace of the goodwill of others? The paper argues
that ideally freedom of speech should take the full, robust form and it
suggests guidelines on how it is best served under progressively non-ideal
conditions.   

Jeremy Waldron (NYU)
What Should a Well-Ordered Society Look Like?
 
This paper will approach the question of hate speech (or group defamation)
by asking about the importance of appearance, signage and display in a
well-ordered society.  To what extent, does a well-ordered society convey a
message of respect to its citizens in the way it looks?  To what extent, is
it appropriate for a well-ordered society to forbid the display of contempt
or hatred?  Some might say that a society's being well-ordered has nothing
to do with these issues of appearance. But the paper argues that it is
important for citizens to show one another the basics of civic respect.  And
it argues that is particularly important, by way of reassurance, when a
society which is presently well-ordered has a recent history of terror,
intolerance and oppression.

plus comments by Helen Irving (University of Sydney) and others.

Date: Wednesday, 15 July 2009
Place: Refectory, Quadrangle Building, The University of Sydney
Time: 1:00pm to 5:00pm (reception to follow)

No registration fee, but booking is essential contact:
[email protected]

Travel subsidies are available for postgraduate students from outside the
Sydney region. Please contact Elia Mamprin, via [email protected]

The symposium is made possible through the generous support of Professors
John and Christine Furedy, alumni of the University of Sydney

Symposium website with updated program and running order to be posted soon.




-------------- 
Duncan Ivison
Professor, Head of School
School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry
University of Sydney
Quadrangle A14
NSW 2006 Australia

61-2-9351 5658
http://www-personal.arts.usyd.edu.au/duncan.ivison/ivison.htm



_______________________________________________
SydPhil mailing list
[email protected]

849 subscribers now served.

To UNSUBSCRIBE, change your MEMBERSHIP OPTIONS, find ANSWERS TO COMMON 
PROBLEMS, or visit our ONLINE ARCHIVES, please go to the LIST INFORMATION PAGE: 
http://lists.arts.usyd.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/sydphil

Reply via email to