|
In addition, the new validation syntax
seems not to support the group parameter… it tries to load ‘group’
as if it was a validator. Gert. From: Hi folks, At validation, if one of the fields in a set of grouped fields is not
empty, the other fields are tested for emptiness, independent of their required
property. This makes it impossible to run a validator on an empty field (which I
need because the field is optional depending on some criteria), but it also
differs from the documented behaviour: From the sf book, the example ‘Execute validator on an empty
field’: If Password1=foo and password2=null, the required_message (in this case
the default, not very descriptive ‘Required’) is shown instead of
the passwordValidator error message. If others consider this as a bug, I will create a ticket with patch. In addition to the group feature, it would be nice to have an option to
execute a validator on an empty field as well. The current dirty
workaround I would use is grouping the possibly empty field with a non-empty
field, but this is also made impossible by the problem above. The only
solution left now is to validate in the action but I want to avoid that. Gert.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
- [symfony-devs] RE: [symfony-users] Validation: ... Gert Vrebos
- [symfony-devs] Re: [symfony-users] Validat... Francois Zaninotto
- [symfony-devs] Re: [symfony-users] Val... Gert Vrebos
- [symfony-devs] Re: [symfony-users]... Francois Zaninotto
- [symfony-devs] Re: [symfony-us... Gert Vrebos - Tactics bvba
