Matthias, Unfortunately I think the plugins need to end in "Plugin" (there's an easy test for this ;) )
Furthermore, Fabien mentioned something at camp about prefixing plugins with out initials versus sf... not sure where that is at. So I'm a little confused as to the reason for creating a new plugin? Is Doctrine 1.0 going to become more or less stable and maybe branch in a new direction for future versions? -d On 9/20/07, Matthias N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > we, Jon Wage and I discussed today to create a new Doctrine plugin > that will be symfony 1.1 only with support for the brand new features > of Doctrine and symfony as well. > > I just wondered if it is possible to have the name "sfDoctrinePlugin2" > as it is the second version of the plugin - not of Doctrine!? IMHO > "sfDoctrine2Plugin" would not reflect what it actually is. > > I want to create a wiki page for a bit of brainstorming before we > start implementing it. > > Is it possible to have the "2" at the end for the wiki page as well as > the plugin name? Or does this not work with the installer or the magic > on the website? > > Regards, > Matthias > > > > > -- Dave Dash 612.670.0621 Discover your favorite restaurant: reviewsby.us gtalk: dave.dash --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
