Fabien POTENCIER wrote: > Do we really need syck support in symfony 1.1 as we now have a better > support for YAML parsing out of the box. All .yml files are cached, so > it really does not give any performance improvement in production. What > do you think? >
Personally, I'm up for removing support for it - I didn't realise a co-worker had it installed on my system. Having said this, I appreciate that my dev platform is pretty beefy, and perhaps some people on laptops/etc would notice a tiny speed improvement. Is there anyone here on a lower end dev system that can quantify the difference between sf1.1's new and improved YAML parser, and the syck module? On a similar note, this isn't the first time that I've been 'bitten' by syck interpretting a .yml differently then sf1.1 - unless the sf1.1 parser and syck preform identically (which, in theory they should, YAML has a detailed spec) then supporting both is a bad idea. I am totally at fault for not writing a test case for this, so I appologies to everyone. Consider me a +1 for removal --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
