Why not static methods?

sfJavascript::link_to_remote()

Supports autoloading, namespaces, is clean and readable, is OOP.

Cheers,
Andreas


Bernhard Schussek schrieb:
> I don't like the $h idea. It's complicated to understand for new
> developers, the extra squared brackets and quotes add unnecessary
> complexity and are prone to errors and last but not least, the array
> syntax is totally misused.
> 
> IMO we should opt for the most simple, but most obvious solution: By
> simply defining the objects in the template.
> 
> <?php $Url = new sfUrlHelper ?>
> 
> <html code...>
> 
> <?php echo $Url->link_to(....) ?>
> 
> This way it's very easy to grasp what's going on, without adding
> unnecessary extra magic.
> 
> 
> Bernhard
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Tristan Rivoallan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Marijn Huizendveld
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I can see some advantages besides the namespacing. Let's just say
>>> that all the helpers inherit their functionality from the library.
>>> Becase of the oop nature  those helper functions are easily
>>> overwritten without _losing_ the original functionality. E.g.
>> indeed. i said i liked the "$h" idea because it was not too cumbersome
>> to use. (even if it's a bit more complicated than the actual helpers).
>>
>> ++
>> tristan
>>
>> --
>> Tristan Rivoallan
>> http://www.clever-age.com
>> Clever Age - conseil en architecture technique
>> GSM: +33 6 219 219 33 Tél: +33 1 53 34 66 10
>>
> 
> > 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to