On 2 Jul., 17:13, "Jonathan Wage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a few questions about the deploy task for 1.2 from you all. I would > like to hear everyones opinion. > > - How far are we trying to take the deploy task this round? I read > somewhere the goal is to have something on the level of capistrano. > - Do we want to integrate database migrations in to the programmable > deploying interface? > - Will it have the ability to integrate with source control for > tagging, branching, etc. and generate patches to deploy code changes? > > This one really interests me because in the past I have used > capistrano for managing svn tags, branches and deploying upgrades/ > downgrades to code with svn diff and patch. I have always wanted to > take it one step further and tie in database migrations to the process > because currently I still run the processes a part from each other. > > Thoughts?
Please consider to support (easy) management of an own pear channel server for deployment. If we had an easy way to setup and communicate with a channel server a project update would be as easy as: pear upgrade mychannel-myproject And it is easy to integrate database migrations support by pre/post- installation hooks of the pear installer. Would be cool to have some tasks for channel-server management. I'm not sure if "advanced deployment" really is a must for the framework. It can also be provided by a plugin. regards Matthias --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
