I've been continuing to use the sf prefix based on Fabien's message here: http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/msg/4c47ffd08aed294a
- Kris On Jul 3, 12:53 am, "Fabian Lange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that was clarified. > sf was intended for official symfony plugins only. and many new plugins > already use the authors initials > .: Fabian > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Matthias N. < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 23 Jun., 09:36, "Bernhard Schussek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Is there any official statement about plugin prefixes? Right now there > > > is a wide mix of "sf" and custom prefixes with no apparent system in > > > behind. > > > I want to release a few plugins in the near future and thus would like > > > to know whether there are any official guidelines about this. > > > Me too. :-) > > It was already discussed in the past but IMHO no final solution was > > found. But I suppose it is ok to choose an own prefix otherwise there > > wouldn't be that much plugins in the repository.. !? > > > Maybe this could be finally clearified or is there already something > > about plugin naming in a wiki page or so? > > > regards, > > Matthias --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
