On Jul 10, 2008, at 12:11 AM, ibolmo wrote: > > I had a similar idea today, but pookey made a good point: search > engines discern this practice.
Well, that depends. Those documents get their own URL, the alias is there only to provide the user with extra "guess-able" URLs. Maybe there should be a parameter to specify the HTTP Status code. > > I think if the alias, wraps the url to a permanent 303 then it would > be fine. > > Olmo > > On Jul 9, 10:28 am, Marijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi everybody, >> >> this week I was wondering if symfony is able to create an alias for a >> routing rule. What I would prefer is something that allows the >> developer to specify an alias url for a certain module, action and >> additional parameters that either is redirected or simply >> forwarded to >> a named routing rule from the routing.yml file. >> >> E.g. >> >> login: >> url: /login/ >> param: >> module: sfGuardAuth >> action: signin >> >> signin_alias_redirect: >> url: /signin/ >> alias: @login >> routing: redirect >> >> signin_alias_forward: >> url: /sign-in/ >> alias: @login >> routing: forward >> >> It seems to me that this would be a behavior that more developers >> might like. Is there something like this out there in the form of a >> plugin or should I file a ticket on this? What are your thoughts? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Marijn > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
