On Feb 3, 2009, at 5:42 PM, Jacob Coby wrote:
> > On Feb 3, 2009, at 11:30 AM, Nicolas Perriault wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Tom Boutell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Subject line says it all. There is no situation in which leaving the >>> cache uncleared after one of the above operations makes sense. It's >>> tedious and accident-prone... why not automate it? >> >> Perhaps because typing ./symfony propel:build-all && ./symfony cc is >> not that hard? ;) > > > It's not that hard, no. But it has confused literally *every* person > I know who has used Symfony. Especially on projects that don't keep > the auto-generated files under source control. "I ran propel-build- > model like you said but it still doesn't work!" > > "Did you run ./symfony clear-cache?" has to be the most common > response in #symfony as well. > > It would be a huge help if build-model and plugin-install both cleared > the autoload cache (along with any other commands that could introduce > new files or paths to autoload). I cannot think of any case where you > would run those commands without wanting to clear the autoload cache. I think that this is the main reason why it is not (yet) automated. But still +1 for me Marijn > > I would not want them to do a full "clear-cache" if possible. > > -- > Jacob Coby > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
