Hi,

afaik symfony unit tests are run through the binaries you find in
test/bin (you don't have symfony task for symfony build :-)) or by
running them directly through php (e.g. php
"test/unit/storage/sfPDOSessionStorage.php")
sfPDOSessionStorageTest is running fine for me.

Martino

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Leon (sfExtjsThemePlugin)
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Dev-ers
>
> I have extended the sfPDOSessionStorage with encryption functionality
> for the session data in my sfPDOSecureSessionStorage class. This is
> working fine in my browsers, but I wanted to add a unit test to secure
> this.
>
> I simply copied the original unit-test from the sfPDOSessionStorage-
> class and modified it to fit my secure sfPDOSecureSessionStorage-
> class. However I cannot seem to run the unit-test. It does not seem to
> be related to my secure-session-class, but more probably due to the
> session_set_save_handler that seems to create two instances of the
> sfPDOSessionStorage. One for sessionOpen, the other for sessionWrite.
>
> How is the sfPDOSessionStorageTest been run before a new symfony
> version is released?
> I run
> symfony test:unit sfPDOSecureSessionStorage
>
> but it tells me
> /symfony test:unit sfPDOSecureSessionStorage
> 1..15
> ok 1 - sfPDOSecureSessionStorage is an instance of sfStorage
> ok 2 - sfPDOSecureSessionStorage is an instance of
> sfDatabaseSessionStorage
>
> Fatal error: Call to a member function prepare() on a non-object in /
> home/leree/workspace/mijnoverheid-symfony/lib/symfony/lib/storage/
> sfPDOSessionStorage.class.php on line 162
>
> Call Stack:
>    0.0003      60604   1. {main}() /home/leree/workspace/mijnoverheid-
> symfony/symfony:0
>    0.0047     307676   2. include('/home/leree/workspace/mijnoverheid-
> symfony/lib/symfony/lib/command/cli.php') /home/leree/workspace/
> mijnoverheid-symfony/symfony:14
>    0.2310    4728120   3. sfSymfonyCommandApplication->run() /home/
> leree/workspace/mijnoverheid-symfony/lib/symfony/lib/command/cli.php:
> 20
>    0.2398    4892204   4. sfTask->runFromCLI() /home/leree/workspace/
> mijnoverheid-symfony/lib/symfony/lib/command/
> sfSymfonyCommandApplication.class.php:72
>    0.2399    4892204   5. sfBaseTask->doRun() /home/leree/workspace/
> mijnoverheid-symfony/lib/symfony/lib/task/sfTask.class.php:75
>    0.4838    4935972   6. sfTestUnitTask->execute() /home/leree/
> workspace/mijnoverheid-symfony/lib/symfony/lib/task/
> sfBaseTask.class.php:62
>    0.4875    4971296   7. include('/home/leree/workspace/mijnoverheid-
> symfony/test/unit/sfPDOSecureSessionStorageTest.php') /home/leree/
> workspace/mijnoverheid-symfony/lib/symfony/lib/task/test/
> sfTestUnitTask.class.php:64
>    0.5919    8600344   8. sfPDOSecureSessionStorage->sessionWrite() /
> home/leree/workspace/mijnoverheid-symfony/test/unit/
> sfPDOSecureSessionStorageTest.php:29
>    0.5926    8600344   9. sfPDOSessionStorage->sessionWrite() /home/
> leree/workspace/mijnoverheid-symfony/lib/storage/
> sfPDOSecureSessionStorage.class.php:141
>
>  Looks like you planned 15 tests but only ran
> 2.
>
>
> I can only explain this with the assumption that
> session_set_save_handler creates two instances, one for the
> sessionOpen-event where $db gets instantiated, and the second for the
> sessionWrite-event where $db is used to call the prepare statement,
> but since this is a new instance, the sessionOpen has never been
> executed for this instance which explains why $db is a non-object.
>
> As said in my browser everything works out OK, but the unit test seems
> to be impossible. So can anyone tell me what goes wrong or how I can
> fix this. I assume this unit test has run everytime before Symfony
> gets released...
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to