Yes that's true, and I'm pleased to hear it and looking forward to 5.3.1. But the larger message about the Remi repository is that it doesn't shy away from unstable stuff (will this happen with PHP 6.0 too? Probably), so it's not a good solution for a client that is currently using a distribution that is TOO conservative (CentOS/RHEL). (:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Oz Basarir<[email protected]> wrote: > > Just an FYI: Looks like this bug has been fixed. Here is a copy/paste from > that link: > > ----------------------------------- > [31 Jul 9:10pm UTC] [email protected] > This bug has been fixed in SVN. > > Snapshots of the sources are packaged every three hours; this change > will be in the next snapshot. You can grab the snapshot at > http://snaps.php.net/. > > Thank you for the report, and for helping us make PHP better. > ----------------------------------- > > > > > On 8/13/09 5:53 AM, "Tom Boutell" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> My first thought here: PHP 5.3.0? PHP 5.3.0 has important features >> (circular garbage collection! At last!) but it also has some huge >> showstopper bugs for production use right now. We were bitten by this >> one right off the bat when a client tried it: >> >> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48880 >> >> They rolled right back to 5.2.6 after fifteen minutes of PHP Apache >> processes quickly going bad and getting stuck in "white page of death" >> mode. Ouch. Now we're working on them to move to 5.2.10. >> >> There's a balance of stability and current-ness to be found out >> there... currently it seems to be called "Ubuntu," but we can't >> necessarily make everyone migrate to Ubuntu, much as we would like to. >> (: >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:47 AM, cdamian<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> We are using the PHP and MySQL RPMs from the Remi Repository, he is >>> currently providing PHP 5.3.0 for RHEL and Fedora. >>> >>> Christof >>> >>> On Aug 9, 5:18 pm, Tom Boutell <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> One of our major clients has moved to building PHP 5.2.x in-house in >>>> order to accommodate Symfony 1.2, but for others it remains an >>>> insurmountable obstacle. >>>> >>>> I think community support is a good solution as long as the community >>>> is allowed to do that on the main symfony trac and using the main >>>> symfony ticketing system, which are crucial for practical acceptance I >>>> think. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Olivier LOYNET<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>> >>>>> That why we are going to migrate all our mains servers from RHEL to Ubuntu >>>>> because they release a stable version every 6 month to match the IT market >>>>> needs. Why to stay with symfony 1.0 applications when you have so much new >>>>> functionnalities in 1.2 and soon in 1.3. >>>> >>>>> Olivier >>>>> http://www.la-souris-verte.com/ >>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> On Behalf Of Nicolas Perriault >>>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 11:21 AM >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: [symfony-devs] Re: Dovetailing the end of Symfony 1.0 support >>>>>> with RHEL6 >>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Tom Boutell<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> right now I'm making the case that ending support for PHP 5.1.x while >>>>>>> it is still in wide deployment in a major linux distribution with no >>>>>>> upgrade yet available in that distribution just doesn't look good >>>>>>> (...) it's bad marketing for Symfony >>>> >>>>>> Frankly, maintaining a 3yo+ version of a Web framework just to please >>>>>> users of one distribution, even a widely (not wisely) adopted one, is >>>>>> just too much time-consumming just for marketing purpose. We should >>>>>> talk about RHEL/CentOS marketing strategy instead ;) >>>> >>>>>> I'm all with the idea of Stefan of putting 1.0 branch maintenance into >>>>>> the hands of the community. That's how it works in a lot of other oss >>>>>> projects, and furthermore not that much can pretend offering official >>>>>> 3 years long term support as with Symfony. >>>> >>>>>> Just my two cents >>>> >>>>>> ++ >>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Nicolas Perriault >>>>>> http://prendreuncafe.com-http://symfonians.net >>>>>> Mobile: +33 660 92 08 67 >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Tom Boutell >>>> P'unk Avenue >>>> 215 755 1330 >>>> punkave.com >>>> window.punkave.com >>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > > > -- Tom Boutell P'unk Avenue 215 755 1330 punkave.com window.punkave.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
