I've attached a patch to the ticket for review. Please comment.
http://trac.symfony-project.org/ticket/8639

Thanks,
Kris

On 10 May, 12:08, Stephen Melrose <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's not that simple Russ.
>
> Where do you perform the check that they are allowed to access/save an
> object of a certain ID?
>
> I personally have always checked the object after I've taken it from the
> route and before I've passed it to the form. After I've done that, I don't
> expect the object to magically be transformed into another record, a.k.a.
> something they're not allowed to access, and I bet the vast majority of
> symfony developers don't either.
>
> Your point is valid and one I've agreed with throughout this thread, if
> you're restricting what a user can edit, you need to make sure you safe
> guard your code properly, and that's something I didn't do purely because I
> didn't expect the scenario I've detailed to occur, and to be honest, nor
> should it.
>
> The ID is passed as a hidden field (for whatever reason), but I don't expect
> the PK to be changed. How often would you actually edit a PK?
>
> I'm simply arguing the PK should be read only be default.
>
> On 10 May 2010 20:01, Russ <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Personally I always check if the user has credentials to edit the
> > object anyway and I couldn't give a monkeys if they change the id
> > using Firebug or whatever as long as it's to one they have access to.
> > If not, they'll get a nice 403 response either way.
>
> > The way I see it, editing the ID using Firebug or some other method
> > would be just the same as if they opened that object up for editing in
> > the first place... As long as they are allowed to, then so be it.
>
> > On May 10, 12:16 pm, Stephen Melrose <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
>
> > > We have discovered what could be a potential flaw in the form
> > > framework. The reason I'm discussing this here is because I'm in mixed
> > > feelings as to whether this is actually bug or not, or rather poor
> > > implementation on our part. Either way, I'm also saying this flaw
> > > should be safe guarded against.
>
> > > We discovered that a malicious user can use the forms generated by the
> > > form framework to edit content they shouldn't be able to.
>
> > > They do this by replacing the primary ID in the hidden form field with
> > > that of the record they want to edit. When they hit save, the
> > > validation is run, and the Object is updated with the new ID, so when
> > > the save() is called, the other row is updated.
>
> > > Now, if we (as in developers) want to restrict editing of content for
> > > certain users, then it is our responsibility to make sure we put safe
> > > guards in place. I'm not arguing this fact.
>
> > > The reason I believe this to be a problem is how users will actually
> > > guard their code. Most people (including myself) run all the safe
> > > guard checks before the Object is passed into the Form on
> > > construction. I don't then expect the POST data to override the
> > > primary key of the Object on save. Infact, I can't think of an
> > > instance I would ever want this to happen.
>
> > > I therefore propose that some sort of restriction/block is put in
> > > place by default that stops the PK of an Object being altered on
> > > bind().
>
> > > Thoughts?
>
> > > Stephen Melrose
>
> > > --
> > > If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
> > security at symfony-project.com
>
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups "symfony developers" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<symfony-devs%2bunsubscr...@google
> > >  groups.com>
> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> > groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
>
> > --
> > If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
> > security at symfony-project.com
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "symfony developers" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<symfony-devs%2bunsubscr...@google 
> > groups.com>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
>
> --
> If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to 
> security at symfony-project.com
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "symfony developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en

-- 
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to 
security at symfony-project.com

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en

Reply via email to