I'm wondering what the reasoning is behind allowing only the four licenses stated in the Developer FAQ:
"The symfony plugin section only lists plugins that are released under a license similar to the symfony one. (...) The following licenses are accepted: MIT, BSD, LGPL, and PHP. " I think the Apache License should be included here as it is similar to the symfony one, and has some benefits over the BSD, and MIT. See also http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40100/apache-licence-vs-bsd-vs-mit Johannes -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
