Lukas, You are correct, __construct is not part of the interface, so that type of DI cannot be combined, you're only left with setter injection. Thanks for positive feedback.
Best, Bulat On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Bulat, > > thanks for this .. really cleans things up nicely. > generally i prefer constructor injection, because it makes it easy to spot > all the dependencies by just looking at the constructor. furthermore it > reduces the risk of getting an instance that isnt fully initialized yet. > > i guess for interface injection it cannot really be combined with > constructor injection though, then again since it also puts the dependencies > in a central location its not so much an issue that the interfaces then use > setters. > > cool stuff. > > regards, > Lukas Kahwe Smith > [email protected] > > > > -- > If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to > security at symfony-project.com > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "symfony developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<symfony-devs%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en > -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
