On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 03.11.2010, at 19:54, Jonathan Wage wrote: > >> What I am saying is we're not just configuring one connection >> instance, we're dynamically creating however many are defined in the >> application configuration. So we cannot have a single connection >> dependency configured in the DI for you to modify. I understand what >> you want but I don't see how to do it. I am open to suggestions on how >> to actually do what you want. > > > hmm maybe we need to make it easier to duplicate service definitions with > different parameters inside the DIC config?
It would be nice to be able to have a service definition that can be defined in the resource configuration and then use a clone of that in the extension class to create the DBAL definitions from. We can do this now, but the problem is we'll have a dummy service for the connection that shouldn't be generated in the container cache. - Jon > > regards, > Lukas Kahwe Smith > [email protected] > > > > -- > If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to > security at symfony-project.com > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "symfony developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en > -- Jonathan H. Wage http://www.twitter.com/jwage -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
