On 24.10.2010, at 11:03, weaverryan wrote: > c) Since all the OS & core bundles will (should) use XML > configuration, the config is even less self-documenting. For its > faults, that was the advantage of YAML in symfony1 - it's free of > extraneous markup, making it fairly self-documenting. Again, the > emphasis will need to be on true documentation in Sf2.
i can accept having different flavors for the config files, but only if we can really ensure that mixing different flavors works. it seems like for the template engines we do not expect this to be possible. is this really going to be possible? can i in the end expect that i can get a bundle that uses XML to define my model's to be extended by a YAML config? regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-devs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-devs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
