The first suggestion I hesitated with a little as I quite liked the
simple top-level structure of app/, src/ and web/, and introducing
vendor/ pollutes that a bit (even if just from a purely aesthetic
POV!). However I think the meanings of src/ versus new src/ and
vendor/ are equally cohesive, and having a separate top-level
directory called vendor/ for third-party code is a pretty common
pattern (Rails does it). If of itself I'd be pretty ambivalent about
the change.
I think the second suggestion (adopting /vendor/<Vendor_Name>/
(<Namespace>/)* etc for third-party vendor directory structure in line
with PSR-0) makes perfect sense.
My question is what the best structure would be for the src/
directory. Should the first directory be a vendor name directory too,
even if that's just a localised 'vendor' called "Application" (or
"App", for consistency) by default?
So:
/src
/App
/Bundle
Or is there still a need for a top(pish)-level non-third-party
directory for bundles?
So
/src
/apps
/(<Application_Name>)+
/bundles
/<Own_Vendor_Name>
/<Bundle_Namespace>
etc?
Douglas
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
