Thanks for your feedback.
I have update my branch with a third commit
https://github.com/vicb/symfony/compare/vicb:master...vicb:router
This commit implements what I suggested at the end of my last email:
- making the automatic route reigstration optional,
- adding the ability to cutomize the prefix.
You can specify the options if your config file. i.e.
<webprofiler:config
toolbar="true"
intercept-redirects="true"
routes-register="true"
routes-prefix="_profiler"
/>
This should solve some the concerns (you can easily import an other
resource if you don't like the default one).
However I am still not convinced this (automatic registration) is a
very good idea... .
Victor.
On Jan 18, 11:49 pm, Christophe COEVOET <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 18/01/2011 23:44, Bulat Shakirzyanov a crit :> I agree with Lukas here,
> > You wouldn't want some extension to decide how the routes will look
> > like, and maybe even hijack your own routes, depending on the order of
> > extensions.
> > This should be explicitly enabled by the end user.
>
> Thus you can choose to overwrite the routes of a bundle if you don't
> like the way the urls look by default. Currently you just add to define
> the routes in your config and not import the bundle's file. It would be
> far more difficult if they are automatically registered.
> So -1 too
>
> --
> Christophe | Stof
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
