Sorry, but there is an obvious solution that is more explicit: Use two routes!

On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:30:11 -0600
ryan weaver <[email protected]> wrote:

> If you think you have a good handle on it and want to work on it, then I say
> try it out. Two words of direction:
> 
> * the feature cannot affect or obfuscate the currently functionality. In
> documentation, it would be explained as an extra, advanced thing to do.
> 
> * you must have good test cases in the work
> 
> If anyone can think of why this is a bad or unnecessary idea, speak up. I
> tend to think most ideas are good... to a fault :)
> 
> @weaverryan
> On Feb 25, 2011 12:22 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> -- 
> If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to 
> security at symfony-project.com
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "symfony developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en

-- 
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to 
security at symfony-project.com

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en

Reply via email to