On 28 Feb 2011, at 16:44, Christophe COEVOET wrote: >> we should be careful not to add so much abstraction and complexity that it >> makes Symfony2 harder to understand and learn for the majority of people who >> will only use it that way. I don't think we're in that situation yet, mind >> you, so it's a cautionary note not a complaint about how it currently is! > Components are standalone. But the linked files are in FrameworkBundle which > is not intended to be a standalone library. It is the framework itself which > tied the components together.
Sounds perfect to me. >> That said, I'm already edgy about having too much choice. There are 3 >> configuration languages - it's presented as a choice and a freedom, but >> because beginners will use YAML, and 3rd party bundles have to use XML, it >> doubles the amount of learning a user has to do before they can understand >> their own projects. > XML is the best practice for third-party bundle internal configuration files. > So a beginner will not need to bother about these files. That's reassuring - thanks for clearing that up for me! I think my point still stands, but it doesn't sound quite as important now. -- Matt -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
