+1 for FQNs, It makes more sense to me, with the current scheme the bundle namespaces are doubled..
If FQNs were used for refencing templates the form would be: Company\FooBundle:Module:action.twig.html as compared to CompanyFooBundle:Module:action.twig.html so not more tedious, if I understand :) On 4 March 2011 13:03, Henrik Bjornskov <[email protected]> wrote: > It would be tedious to write when doing templates. > Like the SoftDelete bundle that namespace is extremly long. > > -- > If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to > security at symfony-project.com > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "symfony developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en > -- Dan Leech Web Developer www.dantleech.com -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
