Robert, Your concern for naming consistency across the bundles is a valid concern; however, in this case I feel the difference is excusable. The "type" option allows things like "xml", "php" and "annotation", so the singular tense is most appropriate in that case (this option is a convention used in both Doctrine bundles as well as things like routing). In the validation block, you're choosing to enable annotation parsing (as in "enable annotations? true/false"). Validation's configuration is unique in that it doesn't allow you to explicitly load by path and a format type. XML/YML loading happens across the board and annotation support - also across the board in its scope - is optional.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Henrik Bjornskov <[email protected]> wrote: > It is two different things, the Vaidator uses a AnnotationReader for > reading validation and the Doctrine project also uses one. > > as a sidenote, if your bundle follows the conventions then you can specify > it with MyBundle: ~ > > -- > If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to > security at symfony-project.com > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "symfony developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en > -- jeremy mikola -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
