But that would not be the full syntax. The full syntax would be
$this->get('request')->get->get('foo'),
which looks ridiculous. I do agree that basically having
$request->request->get('foo') looks weird, but I am far more annoyed that
the parameter bags are public properties than I am with the naming.

Magnus

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Catalin Costache <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I agree, that's why I didn't insisted on the query bag.
> But RFC's aside I think that $this->get('request')->get is more self
> describing
> than $this->get('request')->query because of the direct analogy with the
> well known
> $_GET and $_POST globals.
>
> Anyway this name makes sense for this property because in the case of a
> getter will be a little weird
> to write $this->get('request')->getGet()
>
> Regards,
> Catalin
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Marc Weistroff 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> As for the $query property, the HTTP rfc defines the parameters given in
>> an url after the question mark as "query".
>> You can check section 3.2.2 at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Marc
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Catalin Costache <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I will like to propose a backward incompatible change to the naming of
>>> the public $request ParameterBag
>>> from the Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request
>>>
>>> In my opinion it should be called $post instead of $request because:
>>> 1. is obvious what part of the request is handled
>>> 2. the current naming is deceiving (I expect to find GET, COOKIE or other
>>> types of request parameters in this ParameterBag)
>>> 3. finally but less important, in a controller you have to write *
>>> $this->get('request')->request->get('parameter')* instead of 
>>> *$this->get('request')->post->get('parameter')
>>> *- a superficial argument, I know.
>>> *
>>> *The same arguments stand also for the $query bag, but that makes more
>>> sense
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>> I will make a pull request if you think that this is ok.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
>>> security at symfony-project.com
>>>
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "symfony developers" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
>> security at symfony-project.com
>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "symfony developers" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
>>
>
>  --
> If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
> security at symfony-project.com
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "symfony developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
>

-- 
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to 
security at symfony-project.com

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en

Reply via email to