On 4/12/11 2:48 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 12.04.2011, at 14:45, Fabien Potencier wrote:
On 4/12/11 2:41 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
So when I announced the decision to use the IRC meetings to finalize decisions
for discussions that have matured to a state where little to no discussions are
necessary during the IRC meeting, the idea of course wasn't to kill the IRC
meetings. We have important topics that need to be pushed on and it seems that
traffic on this list has dropped considerably. Most questions on this list seem
to be user questions and not development related.
That's good news to me. It probably means that we are almost done.
What do we want to do?
There are at least still two big topics still on the table:
- API namespace [1]
We don't do that at this point.
so what does this mean for translations?
i guess given that so many wanted things to switch to keys, but nobody has
produced code either means that nobody felt that their proposal would have a
sufficiently high chance of being accepted or that its not such a biting issue
after all?
I still don't see why a few keys in the core is a problem. But I can see
why I don't want to add the complexity of a fake translation layer in
each component.
Fabien
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
[email protected]
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
