On 27.04.2011, at 22:07, Jordi Boggiano wrote: > On 27.04.2011 21:42, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: >> >> On 27.04.2011, at 21:40, Fabien Potencier wrote: >> >>> On 4/27/11 9:26 PM, Jordi Boggiano wrote: >>>> Thinking about it some more, maybe the routes should not check that at >>>> all, you could use annotations on the action and then a >>>> core.controller (is there such a thing?) event listener to check based >>>> on the request headers + what is defined on the action for supported >>>> formats then decide whether the request is acceptable or not, and if >>>> yes, set the preferred request format. >>> >>> Sounds much better to me. >> >> >> But this means that the route is already matched. Which means you cannot >> automatically fallback to a route that better matches. > > core.controller can modify the controller to be executed, so in theory > you *could* one way or another, but I guess that may be expensive.
its also inventing another concept where a better one already exists. anyway, i guess i will just need to then override router.real to do what is necessary. regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith [email protected] -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
