On 9/22/12 9:19 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 21.09.2012, at 08:45, Fabien Potencier
<fabien.potenc...@symfony-project.com> wrote:
* merging 2.0 into 2.1 is a major PITA (just for me actually) as all the tests
were moved in 2.1, and because the form framework evolved a lot as well, so it
takes me more and more time to merge 2.0 into 2.1;
* we can decide to keep the 2 months period but still accept security fixes for
a longer period of time (6 months).
we talked about changing the merging policy in Denver. ie. we would merge bug
fixes to master and then merge it down ro previous releases. i dont remember
the pros and cons we listes back then. but it might become more necessary to
enable delegation of responsibility.
I think the current worflow is the best one as we can check very easily
which patches/PRs are merged in which branches. So, I don't think that
changing this strategy would be good.
regards,
Lukas
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-devs@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
symfony-devs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
