On 7 Mar 2013, at 19:13, Beau Simensen <simen...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, March 7, 2013 4:05:17 AM UTC-6, Matt Robinson wrote: > Finally, just out of curiosity, what's the benefit of using HttpKernel to > make a static site generator. Wouldn't you just need Pimple, Finder, Twig, > and Markdown (and maybe Assetic and Imagine if you want to be fancy with > resources)? > > I wanted to support plugins in a nice way. I was rolling my own plugin system > but realized (thanks to the help of Rob Loach) most of what I wanted to do > could be done out of the box by HttpKernel's bundles and their tight > integration with the dependency injection container. So I switched gears. > > Of course you can build a static site generator in any number of ways and at > any level of complexity. :) I know a lot of people who have rolled their own > micro implementations that did exactly what they wanted to do.
Ahh, thanks! -- -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on Symfony, please read the procedure on http://symfony.com/security You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-devs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-devs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Symfony developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to symfony-devs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
