On 7 Mar 2013, at 19:13, Beau Simensen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, March 7, 2013 4:05:17 AM UTC-6, Matt Robinson wrote: > Finally, just out of curiosity, what's the benefit of using HttpKernel to > make a static site generator. Wouldn't you just need Pimple, Finder, Twig, > and Markdown (and maybe Assetic and Imagine if you want to be fancy with > resources)? > > I wanted to support plugins in a nice way. I was rolling my own plugin system > but realized (thanks to the help of Rob Loach) most of what I wanted to do > could be done out of the box by HttpKernel's bundles and their tight > integration with the dependency injection container. So I switched gears. > > Of course you can build a static site generator in any number of ways and at > any level of complexity. :) I know a lot of people who have rolled their own > micro implementations that did exactly what they wanted to do.
Ahh, thanks! -- -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on Symfony, please read the procedure on http://symfony.com/security You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Symfony developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
