Do you have time to help implement the plugins in this way? - Jon
Matthias Nothhaft wrote: > Jonathan H. Wage wrote: > >> That is correct, I added the e-mail address because it was needed for >> the forgot password functionality, then someone came along and didn't >> like it so they removed the e-mail address, but it looks like they did >> not remove it completely. >> >> How about we add the e-mail address to the plugin but make it a >> configurable option in the schema. That way we can have the e-mail >> address and forgot password functionality as something you can turn on >> and off? >> >> Or maybe somehow we can create a sfGuardForgotPasswordPlugin and hook it >> in to sfGuard? Any ideas? >> > > This is a question of how to organize plugins of plugins. > > My wish and hope is: Please do not only "fix this plugin" but think > about a general solution to have a good concept for future plugins. > > A second wish is: Please consider to change the plugins so that the > sfGuardPlugin is driver based: > > One sfGuardPlugin and driver plugins for Propel and Doctrine. > > Then the plugin needs some Mixins or something like an event/observer > support so that other plugins can easily plugin.. (I hate the term > "plugin"...) ;-) > > Hmm.. I hope one day some people will understand why I repeat these > wishes again and again... :-( > > It would make it more fun to contribute and much easier to build a nice > plugin library for symfony. > > Regards, > Matthias > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
