Speed isn't really a concern - I'm more concerned with readability,
maintainability and extensibility. Besides which, the page gets built once,
then cached - so your point is moot.

If we continue your endform_tag logic, why bother with the other asset
helpers?

An endform_tag would literally output "</form>", which is more characters
(although I think it's actually easier to understand than a mismatched
form_tag and </form> pair [how many editors barf at this???], but I
digress...) whereas my proposed tag would have options such as target,
class, id, style etc.

The point of the helper is to make life easier by outputting valid xhtml -
with </form> you can't get this wrong - where you can specify multiple
options, you can.

I see far more use for this than say the stylesheet or javascript helpers,
which essentially don't do anything else other than prefix /web/css and
web/js respectively.

:)

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ian P. Christian
Sent: 06 December 2007 14:31
To: [email protected]
Subject: [symfony-users] Re: Asset helper for "generic link"?


Lee Bolding wrote:
> Is there some solution that I'm missing other than manually coding the
link
> in my template? (which looks a bit odd when mixed amongst all the
link_to's)

It might look odd - but it's faster....

I don't really see much point in implementing a function just to make 
things look nicer in the template, that's like asking for a 
endform_tag() function, just because there's a form_tag() isn't it?


-- 

Ian P. Christian ~ http://pookey.co.uk




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to