For those of you using sfDoctrinePlugin with symfony 1.1 from here:
http://svn.symfony-project.com/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/trunk, please switch
to
http://svn.symfony-project.com/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/1.0-sf1.1

I will be working in trunk to get the sfDoctrinePlugin 1.1 version prepared
and will branch to 1.1-sf1.1 as soon as it is complete and stable.

Thanks, Jon

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Jonathan Wage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Their is no standard rule. It is basically up to the developer :) I think
> it would be worth enforcing a naming pattern for plugins so that we can have
> proper naming for multiple versions of plugins which depend on multiple
> versions of symfony.
>
> - Jon
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Jay Klehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > How are other plugins dealing with Symfony 1.1?  (naming of branches and
> > the sort)
> >
> > Jay
> >
> > Jonathan Wage wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I will be doing some work on the sfDoctrinePlugin for a new version.
> > > This will require that we make some changes to the way things are
> > > organized in svn. I am going to propose a structure for the branches
> > > and tags.
> > >
> > > Currently we have sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/0.1 and
> > > sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/1.0, below is an explanation of what each is
> > > currently, and what I want to change it to.
> > >
> > > sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/0.1 - The very first version of the
> > > sfDoctrinePlugin, which is linked to a super outdated version of
> > > Doctrine. This branch likely doesn't even work anymore. I would
> > > recommend removing it completely?
> > >
> > > sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/1.0 - The current stable sfDoctrinePlugin
> > > 1.0 that is compatible with symfony 1.0
> > >
> > > sfDoctrinePlugin/trunk - The current stable sfDoctrinePlugin 1.0 that
> > > is compatiable with symfony 1.1
> > >
> > > I want to propose a new structure.
> > >
> > > Rename sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/0.1 to
> > > sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/0.1-sf1.0
> > > Rename sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/1.0 to
> > > sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/1.0-sf1.0
> > > Branch sfDoctrinePlugin/trunk to sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/1.0-sf1.1(I
> > > have already done this)
> > >
> > > Continue development of new version of sfDoctrinePlugin-1.1 compatible
> > > with symfony 1.1 in trunk and when it is done:
> > >
> > > Branch sfDoctrinePlugin/trunk to sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/1.1-sf1.1
> > >
> > > The naming pattern is "Plugin.Version-sfDependency-Version". Tags
> > > would be pretty much the same except with point releases on the
> > > version numbers, i.e. sfDoctrinePlugin/tags/1.1.2-sf1.1,
> > > sfDoctrinePlugin/tags/1.0.2-sf1.1, etc.
> > >
> > > I think having this pattern for all plugins would be a good thing.
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Thanks, Jon
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jonathan Wage
> > > http://www.jwage.com
> > > http://www.centresource.com
> > > >
> >
> >
> > > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Wage
> http://www.jwage.com
> http://www.centresource.com
>



-- 
Jonathan Wage
http://www.jwage.com
http://www.centresource.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony users" group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to