On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Lawrence Krubner wrote: > Well, thanks, but "followed the history" is a lot to ask. There is > already so much to learn, without going back a few years to get the > full historical perspective.
Well, both 1.1 and 1.2 are less than a year old. A lot of the changes were blogged about on the symfony site before the actual releases... I just feel if you're heavily invested in a particular technology, its up to you to follow it closely. Just my opinion. > And after all, what is the point of using a framework? Clients, and > web design firms, prefer frameworks for their long term stability. > Otherwise we'd all simply be writing our own ad-hoc code. Which is why a lot of people are still using 1.0 especially if they have stuff in production. Ive been working on symfony sites for almost 3 years and we're still using 1.0. But support for 1.0 officially ends later this year so Ive been working through the 1.0->1.1->1.2 documentation and testing our code. We have a redesign of a major site going live in the summer and it looks like it will be based on 1.2. So I see it as part of my job to be aware of what the changes are and what's possibly coming down the pipe. -- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
