Data dumps are problematic, at least on Postgres. If you don't have
your PK fields named 'id' it chokes. I've named mine 'table_name_id'.
Data dump doesn't work.

On Oct 8, 8:37 am, david <[email protected]> wrote:
> Reverse engineering from an existing DB is just a quick way of  
> bootstrapping the start of a project.
>
> Doctrine doesn't handle views very well - although it is aware of them.
>
> Working around this problem when creating some new Doctrine drivers for  
> CouchDB & RDF I've used view behaviours and then annotate the schema to  
> get a clean implementation.
> The behaviour handles the view creation and the model gets generated  
> accordingly referencing/overloading the referenced base table and  
> importing the appropriate keys.
>
> The yml looks like:
>
> locationsInEurope:
>    tableName: locationsInEurope
>    actAs:
>      hasViews:
>        references: Locations
>    columns:
>      country_id:
>        type: integer(4)
>      region_id:
>        type: integer(4)
>      city_id:
>        type: integer(4)
>      district_id:
>        type: integer(4)
>
> Regarding data dumps - the doctrine:data-dump task is a better way of  
> handling extracting and reloading the db.
>
> On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:58:51 +0200, ridcully <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi John,
>
> > the Problem is when you doing the views this way is, you don't have a
> > clean
> > deployment anymore  then we can't use symfony build-all-reload-test
> > for the dev. Team.
> > I must use SQL-Dumps and I think this is not the right way, because
> > you
> > can't change the Model quick and easy.
>
> > There must be a better way to do this, because we need a the mostly
> > clean Deployment without SQL-Dumps.
>
> > Many thanks for your answer,
> > Jörg
>
> > On Oct 8, 11:47 am, John Masson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
>
> >> We were discussing this at work yesterday. One of the guys came up
> >> with the same solution and it sounds quite reasonable.
>
> >> Out of interest we reverse engineered a schema.yml from a DB that had
> >> a view in it just to see what would happen. Symfony includes the view
> >> in the schema.yml file just like it was a regular table, but there was
> >> nothing to identify it as a view rather than a table that I could see,
> >> so presumably if we forward engineered the database from this
> >> schema.yml it would have created a table not a view (should have done
> >> that just to confirm I guess)
>
> >> My recommendation would be to create your DB as you want it, then
> >> reverse engineer your schema.yml with a ./symfony doctrine:build-
> >> schema then build-model, forms, filters etc... Just saves you dropping
> >> the tables and recreating the views which you'd have to do if you work
> >> in the opposite direction (although it's not such a big deal I guess).
>
> >> John
>
> >> On Oct 7, 7:48 pm, ridcully <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > Hi,
>
> >> > how can I use Database Views in Symfony with Doctrine? I need them
> >> > because of performance reasons.
>
> >> > My Idee was to create dummys in the model and after building the Model
> >> > to drop the dummy tabels and create SQL Views.
>
> >> > Is there a better way to do this?
>
> --
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:http://www.opera.com/mail/- Hide 
> quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to