Very interesting! Thanks for the link. Maybe this will be the
motivation I need to switch the project to Doctrine.

Thanks,
Craig

On Feb 21, 3:33 pm, Matt Gibson <goth...@gothick.org.uk> wrote:
> On 21 Feb 2011, at 21:59, Craig Wright wrote:
>
> > So my question: this seems like both a non-optimal solution (will need
> > to update this every time sfGuardSecurityUser::signIn changes), and
> > also, this seems like more-optimal behavior than the default. My
> > question is, does this belong in sfGuardPlugin natively? If so, should
> > I or how should I contribute it to to the plugin? Or is this the
> > "right" way to do it?
>
> Coincidentally, I was just looking into the same lack in 
> sfDoctrineGuardPlugin -- at least for that plugin, the way someone else went 
> was to create a better "remember me" for it as a plugin -- 
> seehttp://www.symfony-project.org/plugins/gbRememberMePlugin. Might give you 
> some hint as to a possible way to go... I've not tried it yet, but the 
> architecture might be helpful for your deliberations, at least...
>
> Matt

-- 
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to 
security at symfony-project.com

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony users" group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en

Reply via email to