Comment #4 on issue 1807 by asmeurer: coverage_report improvement http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1807
OK, I think I understand. This should be much clearer in the documentation, i.e., the differences between what test files are run and what files are checked for coverage and how to get each one. For example, it's not clear that apparently sympy/core/tests/test_basic is not caught by the -s option in bin/coverage_report.py -s sympy/core sympy/core/tests/test_basic.py.
Actually, why not make it so you can catch as many paths before and after the -s as you want.
Also, there's the issue of a line being covered, but not in an explicit test in the file you would expect. But I guess the correct way to use this would be to run the full coverage first, then only a single test file but being aware of lines that were covered in the first run.
-- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
