Updates:
Labels: -PassedReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #16 on issue 1823 by [email protected]: integral.atoms(Symbol)
should introspect
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1823
Actually, I don't like this approach, though the functionality is needed,
but it's part of a bigger problem: I'm generally dissatisfied with the way
we handle bound variables and I think that expr.atoms(Symbol) should
actually return what your expr.symbols does. This isn't easy to change so I
suppose that your commit is useful for the time being.
However, there's one specific thing I disagree with: the name 'symbols' is
ambiguous. It's not clear why it should return something else
than .atoms(Symbol) and, assuming it does, I'd rather expect
integral.symbols to return the integration symbols
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
