Updates:
Status: Started
Labels: -smichr
Comment #10 on issue 1980 by [email protected]: has, has_any_symbols,
has_all_symbols unified
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1980
I'm reopening this: given that the 'all' version wasn't used, I don't think
it should have special syntax support. Using 'all(expr.has(x) for x in
[...])' is clear and explicit.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/127
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
