Comment #1 on issue 3113 by [email protected]: Name clash: Basic.is_real vs Set.is_real
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3113
Transferring the assumptions from Basic to Expr would make the problem (mostly) go away (cf. issue 2391). Otherwise, we could simply rename Set.is_real.
Both sound like good ideas to me. They obviously should be on Expr (or at least those particular ones). In general, maybe we would want to use assumptions on non-Expr objects. I'm not sure.
Renaming would remove user ambiguity, though it would break API (or is this new since the release?). How about is_realset?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
