Comment #10 on issue 3768 by [email protected]: Printing oddness
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3768
Maybe just e151? That won't repr, but at least it doesn't look like 0. I
personally still just think 1e151 is the best, though. To me, "not
doubling" is much better than "looks like 0". But even more so, if there's
some standard notation, we should just use that. What is the origin of the
0e151 notation?
Regarding the integral, open a separate issue for it. I don't entirely
understand how Float precision works, nor the numerical integration
algorithm, so I can't say. If you use the slower but more direct as_sum()
you get an answer. Try playing with the quadrature too.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
