> While I do not make use of all the features of Mercurial, I've found > it to be quite nice when for doing SAGE development. I currently have > three different branches that I'm doing development on for features > which independent of each other. Within each branch, I can make > commits, revert them etc. When I have something to submit, it's easy > to make a hg bundle / patch against the main branch for William to > apply.
Thanks Mike for the information. It seems to me that if we move from svn, we should choose either git or mercurial. Mercurial seems to be a little more documented and easier to switch to from svn. Also it should work on windows. So I myself am inclined to mercurial. The only problem is that we will have to host the repository somewhere else (I know hg it is decentralized but still I think there should be some official repository). Anyway, I myself am fine with svn, but if others want to change it, no problem with that. I'll try to play with Mercurial to see how I like it. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
