> So it seems that several people at the same time feel that sympy would > be good for generating FE bases at least, in terms of either tabulated > data in common sets of quadrature points, or a generated C(++) code, to > be re-used later. Thanks for sending your code. I think we could start a > new project (at googlecode?) using your code as a good start. Are you ok > with a BSD license?
Yes, let's do that. However, there should be a leader, who will push things forward and make sure it is coordinated. Is anyone willing to do it? Yes, I actually prefer BSD to GPL, especially now with those GPL 2 and GPL3 incompatibility. What name to use - SymFEM? It needs to be a name, that is easy to google, symfem is. How about calling sympy by default, so that it works in pure python (easy to install, works on windows/linux/mac os x for free), and calling swiginac optionally for speed? And also trying to speed sympy up (my bet is on Cython[1]). This means converging with the interface of swiginac and sympy. Since I am a coauthor of both, it shouldn't be that difficult. But swiginac is now under the hood of Ola Skavhaug, I didn't really touch it for two years - but I think Ola will also be interested in that (CCing him)? See related posts to sympy mailinglist[2]. Ondrej [1] http://cython.org/ [2] http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/browse_thread/thread/cdf44eebad6c1237 http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/browse_thread/thread/f73b00d1bdf0255a --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
